Earl Harris III
Jim,
I’m not sure whether you want me to address you in the first or third person singular. If you’re not reading my posts, then I would prefer the latter in addressing things you have to say on this message forum. On the other hand , if you would like for me to respond to you personally because you are, in fact, reading my posts,(and, I think you are…), then say so. I would be happy to respond to you in the first person as I am doing here.
In your most recent post, #11931, I can safely deduce that you were offended by the length of my message, especially my use of quotes when you chose to write the following: “ I am sick of the left, taking over the Forum with their blathering never-ending proclamations that can be measured only in feet because I never count the words. I wish they would STOP quoting people which is only meant to show “us” how much smarter they are. I am NOT impressed. They are NOT professors and they are NOT smarter than any of us.”
You may be pleased to learn that I have deleted all of my quotes from my post, #11916. You might want to go back and read all of it, again. It’s much shorter now and devoid of those condescending quotes that you found objectionable. I actually think it’s better, now. Thanks. By the way, Jim, I have always counted you among the more intelligent participants on this forum. It's just that I disagree with many of your positions and will reserve the right to object whenever I feel the need to do so.
I do want to challenge a number of your assertions.
First, the left has not taken over Camelback's Message Forum. If anything, I believe the opposite is true. It’s only recently that a small minority of lefties have returned to the site to challenge some of the ideas being espoused here by those on the right, some quite nastily stated, I might add. Today, there seems to be more of a balance in terms of information and opinions shared that was sorely missing in the past.
I also would like to challenge your assertion that my posts are long, ones that can be “measured only in feet”. While I agree that the last one was too long and could have benefited from being divided into two parts, or separate posts, if we were to add up all of the verbiage you have offered over the years, including multiple daily posts, I think you would be the hands-down winner when it comes to number of words posted. Yes, Jim, you win!
In a not too distant post you indicated that you no longer read anything that I write. You included my name along with a couple others whom I consider to be good company. In addition, you have made it clear that I’m “NWMFT (not worth my f****** time)”. I must admit that every time I see this acronym, I cringe. Perhaps you could compare it to the quotes I deleted from #11916. Not only does it seem condescending, but it reveals more than I would hope to see from you, a declaration on your part to either remain ignorant, and/or dismissive of opinions that do not comport with your own.
Lastly, to call Richard Deshong a “ sanctimonious jerk” for his reaction to Mike’s post, is not appropriate, Jim. We are all grown men. Richard‘s frustration with Mike’s posting, shared carelessly by you with Mike, should not have been posted and, consequently, gone unchecked. Strong words were used by Richard, but if we are to confront ignorance, misinformation and lies on this discussion forum, they were an appropriate use of words given the circumstance.
|