Earl Harris III
I recently finished reading David Grann’s widely acclaimed book, “Killers of the Flower Moon”. His masterpiece is being recognized by many news organizations and lierary critics as one of the best books of the year which, coincidentally, will be released as a major motion picture tomorrow.
I must admit that this genre of literature, one that I choose to describe as “well-researched non-fiction investigative journalism” is my favorite. It is for that reason I’ve been a fan of Jon Krakauer who penned “Into Thin Air,” “Under the Banner of Heaven,” “Where Men Win Glory,” “Missoula: Rape and the Justice System in a Small College Town,” and “Into the Wild,” among his many essays and other books.
And, if you haven’t been treated to the works of Daniel James Brown, most notably, “Under a Flaming Sky,” “The Indifferent Stars Above,” or the “The Boys in the Boat,” may I suggest a trip to your local library or checking out reviews on Amazon. My next read by Brown: “Facing the Mountain, An Inspiring Story of Japanese American Patriots in World War II”.
All three of these authors’ works represent some of the best investigative journalism available. Their well researched and annotated books and essays chronicle events in our history that are truly fascinating in a way that fiction, whether fanciful or one based on history, cannot.
Why, may you ask, am I taking the time here to share this on our CHS Message Forum, one that has been dominated by opinions coming from the most extreme right end of the political spectrum? In what ways might it relate to the current political discourse, if you can call it that?
There are several reasons I’ve chosen to post today.
First and foremost, I am impressed with Katie’s attempts to claw her way back into the fray in order to introduce both facts and opinions that will serve, hopefully, to counter some of the far-right’s often spurious accounting of history and current political landscape. She has helped to bring more balance to the discourse and has done so with an increased emphasis on civility that I had found sorely missing over the past 24 months. It’s important for everyone to know that the views posted on this forum are far more diverse than the six or seven usual participants might suggest. Thank you, Katie!
I suspect this is tough work for Katie to have to go it alone, but I salute her for her willingness to put herself out there, especially when she is routinely criticized.
I also wish to support Mike Lorts and others on the center and left who occasionally comment. I especially appreciate Mike’s sense of humor.
My second reason for posting today is to express my strongly held belief that facts and truth matter. Whether it’s the choice of literature for me, or trying to make sense of the world outside, facts and truth are paramount.
There was a time several decades ago when almost all of us got our nightly dose of news from a single source whether from nightly TV news presented by Chet Huntley, Walter Cronkite, David Brinkley, John Chancellor or others, or from our local newspapers. Often, if there was disagreement between Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives, it was around the edges.
However, since the advent of the Internet and proliferation of multiple sources of media, it is much more difficult for us to come together around an understood and agreed upon “set of facts”. Indeed, it was claimed by some in the Trump administration that there was an “alternate set a facts and truth” that should believed. In my view, we’ve become a very polarized and distrustful citizenry who, regardless of our political persuasion, at times view the “other side” as an existential threat to our country and to ourselves.
Perhaps there is justification for our concerns. I, for one, find that authoritarian nationalist movements here and around the world pose a real threat to democracies. But, if we are to succeed in preserving democracy, we need to understand and at least acknowledge our differences in order to try to make sense of the mess we’re in today.
Why does the vast gulf between competing ideologies seem to be growing? I would like to suggest that media bias provides us with real and potentially difficult challenges regarding true facts and truth that cannot be ignored. I am sometimes flabbergasted, for example, when I change from MSNBC, an admittedly left-leaning media source that I routinely watch, to right-wing cable channels such as Fox News, OAN or Newsmax. Viewers of each, in my opinion, occupy two different planets. I find this situation almost intolerable, wondering why there isn’t more violence between the constantly warring sides.
Are we on the precipice of a Civil War in this country? Some right-wing extremists have been advocating such. Will our centuries-old democratic dream finally come to its end? That’s a horrible thought to contemplate.
It is not my intent to get into the weeds on what constitutes a right or wrong set of beliefs, goals or political policies we should be pursuing in this country. I do have some rather strong beliefs, I must admit. But, I also believe that if we are to move forward, it's going to take serious compromise for us to best serve our country's citizens. But, I’ll save that for another time.
What I would like to offer to my fellow graduates in this post is the hope that you might take some time to look at other points of view other than the ones that fervently and continuously embraced by your team. I’m not asking you to change your mind on anything including politics or any other preciously held views. Conversely, you’re not likely to change mine.
One thing that you might do, however, is look at some of the media bias rating services out there to see where your media sources stand in terms of verifiable treatment of “facts”, newsworthiness, and political bias. I have found it to be a valuable resource when I’m looking to tap into sources other than ones I regularly depend upon.
*Full disclosure: I get the majority of my daily news from MSNBC (either Nicole Wallace, Ari Melber, or Lawerence O’Donnell) as well as from the ABC nightly news. I also subscribe to and read daily, the New York Times, the Washington Post, and occasionally The Economist. I also scan for articles from a multitude of other press sources each morning.
I can almost visualize some of you who’ve chosen to read my post up to this point with hands thrown up in the air, screaming into your iPads or phone. Some of you might be saying, “No wonder he’s a socialist and communist who hates America!” Maybe not, but I and others who consider ourselves centrists or liberals have been labeled as such and in some cases, worse.
Still with me? Here are three sources that I’ve gone to when I think I’ve gotten a bit too far to the left and want to read or watch a news source that is considered by objective raters to be more "newsy" or demonstrates less bias with respect to opinions.
In doing so, I’m hoping to broaden my thinking. I know it’s been helpful at times in terms of lowering my the stress level. And, yes, at times I will purposely choose to learn more about consumers of content on the right side of the charts. What are they viewing and thinking and why?
Admittedly, it’s very hard thing to get into another’s world with whom you have big differences. In fact, sometimes I find it absolutely scary. But, occasionally I choose to look, knowing that if there’s ever going to be a way to shrink the divide between us, it’s going to start with both parties first trying to understand the other. Here are the three links that with a simple click should take you to their services.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/2023/10/19/the-latest-fact-checks-curated-by-media-bias-fact-check-10-19-2023/
https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart
https://adfontesmedia.com/interactive-media-bias-chart/
I’ve used all three, but I especially like the interactive chart that adfontes provides. You can do some very interesting, in-depth analysis of media sites along a number of angles. There is a helpful demo that you can click on that will show you the possibilities. Again, regardless of your political persuasion, you might find it very interesting, informative and helpful.
Again, I strongly believe that facts and truth matter. Sometimes, in order to get it those facts and to understand the true nature of things you need to pursue them with the dedication akin to that of a good investigative journalist.
I think we could all benefit by taking a step back to consider how our reliance on highly biased news sources might be getting in our way. One thing is crystal clear to me: Simple parroting of pundits from our favorite cable channel hasn't helped one iota. Sloganeering or name calling or the spewing of unverified half-truths or spreading disinformation or trotting out lies won't win an argument. It certainly won't win over any converts. We've all seen where it's gotten us on this message forum over the past 2-3 years. It's time to do something different.
|